BioPAX or SBML?
Katherine Mejia asked this question on twitter, well just now I want to keep it short,
- Both BioPAX (Level 3) and SBML (Level 2) can encode signaling pathways, metabolic pathways and regulatory pathways, although SBML can represent finer details.
- If your aim is simulation and prediction then SBML seems to be reasonable choice.
- SBML has better software and API support than BioPAX, no doubt this one is major advantage with SBML.
- Similarly BioPAX is rich standard when it comes to encode the interactions such as genetics, molecular or non-molecular.
Visual comparison of SBML, BioPAX, CellML and PSI
3 Responses to “BioPAX or SBML?”
Latest Tweets
-
Hello OzFebruary 11, 2012 at 5:56 pm -
Good move by Elsevier, but company need more than PR efforts to save it's ground. Why so afraid accepting the new reality, open is future.February 11, 2012 at 3:01 am
-
Dear Entrepreneur, CXO of unknown start-up with uncertain business model, be grounded and humble. cheersFebruary 10, 2012 at 2:53 am
@KatherineMejia may be this can help BioPAX or SBML? http://tinyurl.com/nfz2jy
@KatherineMejia may be this can help BioPAX or SBML? http://tinyurl.com/nfz2jy
Liked: BioPAX or SBML?- by Fisheye Perspective http://ow.ly/giZE